Tomorrow Roberto Alomar and Bert Blyleven will be enshrined in the baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York. Their plaques will hang in the same building as immortals such as the Babe, Stan the Man, Joltin' Joe and all the rest, as they rightfully should . This duo didn't have a major impact on the game as far as setting records, earning memorable nicknames or having statues built in their likeness, but instead got in by consistently producing at a high level for a long time. They didn't have easily defined "career" years and their numbers never overwhelmed; Alomar didn't swat 25 longballs, record 200 base knocks, or swipe 60 bags in any of his 17 seasons just as Blyleven didn't win 25 games, post a 2.50 ERA or whiff 300 batters at any point in his 22 big league campaigns. Critics might point that out, by my response is this; "so what? and who cares?" Neither made a sizable dent on the record books, but that doesn't matter because they were still very, very good for quite awhile.
And in baseball, that means something.
Alomar, with his dozen All-Star selections, ten Gold Gloves and .300 career batting average, was arguably the best all-around second baseman since Joe Morgan (honorable mention goes to Ryne Sandberg, Craig Biggio, Jeff Kent, and Chase Utley). He combined speed (474 steals) with power (210 dingers) and production (1,508 runs scored and 1,134 batted in) while playing earning a reputation for sterling defense, even though newer defensive statistics believe he was overrated (I'm looking at you, Derek Jeter). He also won back-to-back World Series titles with the Blue Jays before they became consumed by the AL Beast. Even though he never won an MVP award and couldn't make a claim as the best player in baseball, he consistently forced his way into the discussion. Robbie deserved to get in his first time on the ballot, but voters "made him pay" by delaying his selection for a year because he spit on an umpire, a decision I find completely ludicrous. No one made Ty Cobb wait even though his sins, attacking a disabled fan and letting his overflowing racism spill onto the field through physical altercations with African American groundskeepers, were much worse. And I doubt Alomar cares, either, because he has his Hall of Fame status, and at the end of the day that's all that matters. Shame on the BBWAA for attempting to serve moral justice.
But I digress. Blyleven was a tougher call because although he played 22 seasons and compiled some amazing career statistics--his 287 wins (pitched until he was 41 but just couldn't hang on for that 300th) and 3,701 strikeouts (fifth all-time) impress-he never really dominated. He only made two All-Star squads (no wonder he was never a household name, but playing in small markets didn't help either), never won a Cy Young award, racked up 250 losses and enjoyed just one twenty win season. Nonetheless, his sustained excellence over the course of two decades and pair of World Series rings eventually won over the voters in his final year on the ballot. After perusing his stats, I don't really see why he was such a borderline case like Jim Rice and Andre Dawson were. His numbers really are spectacular, and in my opinion he should have been elected much sooner, but that's the Hall of Fame for you (you know there are people who didn't vote for Willie Mays, right? I would like to know what they smoking during the fifties and sixties). I'm glad he didn't have to wait for a less meaningful selection by the Veterans Committee, though, as getting in twenty-plus years after retirement just seems to lack the same sense of special accomplishment.
Congratulations Bert and Robbie. You guys earned your places in the Hall, something not everyone in Cooperstown can say.
I totally agree! I believe that Blylevin was a solid pitcher but I love Roberto Alomar and to me he is a first balloter! He was born to play baseball and he was a terrific all-around player! I love second basemen who can hit 20 to 30 Home runs or even 40 on a rare occasion, but Roberto was never gonna do that. I also like the second basemen that have NO hitting power, but they can make contact with the ball and put it in play which is more valuable to me than the slugger.
ReplyDeleteAnd there are those that can steal bases which is very difficult to do! In those three things that I like it seems to me that Roberto Alomar was never gonna do that. However what he did was compete at a high level and help his team win 2 world series and become nearly a dynasty! He was the consumate ballplayer who is everything that an athlete should be and that should be the standard for major league baseball!
Indeed, Alomar was a tremendous baseball player who could do everything well. Those players tend to get underrated and underappreciated (I'm thinking of the Bobby Abreu/Barry Larkin mold) because they don't excel in any one thing, meaning they don't hit 50 home runs or steal 80 bases or bat .350. But at the end of the day, they are the most valuable players because they can contribute in every facet of the game.
Delete